MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4396998157 · doi:10.1681/asn.20203110s1637b

Temporal Trends of the Burden of CKD Among Hospitalized Aortic Stenosis Patients in the Province of Quebec, Canada

2020· article· en· W4396998157 on OpenAlexaffabout
N. Khélifi, Denis Hamel, Sonia Jean, Claudia Blais, Fabrice Mac‐Way

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de Santé Publique du QuébecUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineStenosisCardiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Aortic stenosis (AS) is associated with valvular calcifications which are highly prevalent in chronic kidney disease (CKD). The aim of this study was to describe the temporal trends of comorbid CKD status in patients hospitalized for AS and evaluate the impact of these two conditions on 1-year mortality in the province of Quebec, between 2000 and 2017. Methods: Using the Quebec Integrated Chronic Disease Surveillance System, we identified patients ≥ 20 years with incident AS using ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes, in the hospital discharge database. We then combined hospital discharges and physician billing claims databases to identify patients with comorbid CKD status in the two years prior to the AS diagnosis. Three subgroups of CKD status were considered: 1) non-CKD, 2) pre-dialysis and 3) dialysis. To allow comparison over time, direct adjustment using age distribution of the 2016-2017 AS population was used for proportion, 1-year all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Results: We included 108,780 patients with incident AS (Women: 51.8%; mean age (±SD): 76.4 ±11.7; non-CKD: 74.2% (n=80,768); pre-dialysis: 24.6% (n=26,809); dialysis: 1.1% (n=1,203). During the study period, the age-adjusted proportion of AS patients with non-CKD comorbid status decreased by 14% (80.7% [95% CI 77.6-84.0] to 69.6% [95% CI 67.2-71.9]). Inversely, the age-adjusted proportion of AS patients with pre-dialysis and dialysis comorbid status increased by 58% (18.5% [95% CI 16.9-20.2] to 29.3% [95% CI 27.8-30.9]) and 46% (0.76% [95% CI 0.5-1.1] to 1.1% [95% CI 0.8-1.4]), respectively. Age-adjusted 1-year all-cause and cardiovascular mortality decreased over time but remained higher in patients with comorbid CKD. In 2015-2016, age-adjusted relative risk (RR) of 1-year all-cause mortality was significantly higher in pre-dialysis (RR=1.56 [95% CI 1.44, 1.69]) and dialysis (RR=2.04 [95% CI 1.62-2.61]) compared to non-CKD patients. Age-adjusted RR of 1-year cardiovascular mortality was also significantly higher in pre-dialysis (RR=1.83 [95% CI 1.66-2.03]) and dialysis (RR=2.28 [95% CI 1.68-3.09]) compared to non-CKD patients. Conclusions: Proportion of patients with incident AS and comorbid CKD increased from 2000 to 2017. One-year all-cause and cardiovascular mortality improved over time but remained higher in AS patients with comorbid CKD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.196

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology→Same topicCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes→French-language works237,207→