Design and Analysis of a Flexible Wristband Antenna for the Internet of Medical things (IoMT) Applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper introduces a flexible wristband antenna designed for Internet of medical Things (IoMT) applications. The antenna operates simultaneously at both 3.5 GHz (5G) and 5.8 GHz (Wi-Fi) frequency bands, making it compatible with various smart devices. The proposed antenna has dimensions of 62×14 mm<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup>and is designed on a flexible leather substrate with a dielectric constant of 2,72 and a loss tangent of 0,02. Since this antenna is intended for wrist-worn applications, it was studied both in free space and on numerical hand conditions, demonstrating impressive and robust performance. Moreover, the impact of wristband bending on the antenna's performance was investigated for practical applications. The SAR analysis confirms that the wristband antenna complies with wearer safety limits and regulations, exhibiting a maximum SAR of0.113 and 0.182 W/kg for 1-gram tissue. Altogether, these features make the proposed wristband antenna an excellent candidate for wearable applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".