Poems in Borobudur Writers: Cultural Reflections and Identity Conflicts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Poetry is a part of literary works that represent the sociocultural life experience of the author which is important to be studied from the perspective of literary anthropology. However, so far research on the literary anthropology of poetry is still very sparse. For this reason, the purpose of this study exists as an effort to explore poetry in the perspective of literary anthropology. The source of the research data is poems by Tjahjono Widijanto published in Borobudur Festival Writers. The research method uses hermeneutics. The results showed that Tjahjono Widijanto's poems are a mirror that reflects values, history, and internal conflicts in Javanese culture in the past. They not only revive cultural heritage, but also strengthen the rich cultural identity in contemporary society. Through the theme of identity and internal conflict, poems by Tjahjono Widijanto illustrate the complexity of the relationship between individuals and their society. For this, language and knowledge are used as tools of power to maintain the dominance of elite groups. This demonstrates the importance of understanding and caring for cultural heritage to build a strong identity sustainably. The implication of this analysis is the need for efforts to understand and respond to cultural dynamics, values, and internal conflicts in society through appreciation of literary works, such as poetry. This is expected to build awareness about the importance of respecting cultural diversity, tolerance, strengthening social relations in a multicultural society.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.019 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".