Probing the Preoccupation of Oil Politics, Avarice, and Wanton Disillusionment in Uzo Nwamara’s Dance of the Delta
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study explores socio-political contradictions, hypocrisies, deceits, and the marginal existence of suppressed and exploited individuals in the Niger Delta communities of Nigeria who are unjustly stifled by a few members of the superstructure. The literary analysis is undertaken through the lens of Uzo Nwamara's play, Dance of the Delta. This study adopts a Marxist framework to examine the aspects of politics of disillusionment and disequilibrium as captured by the playwright. This is to see the fidelity of the play to the region in terms of verisimilitude. Marxism as a critical template for this study is an economic and political theory that draws close attention to the unfair exploitation of the masses by the political class. It seeks a reversal of the system so that a greater portion of the people's wealth is entrusted to the people who produce it. The study underscores that the underdevelopment of the Niger Delta region, despite its enormous mineral resources, is hinged on the avaricious nature and corruption of a few members of society, who are metaphorically represented through the characters of Chief Akpan and his cohorts. It therefore concludes that the revolutionary consciousness of the oppressed and suppressed is sine qua non for the dethronement of injustice and corrupt practices.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".