Demonstration of a 0.8 W continuous wave bulk laser around 2 μm in a Tm<sup>3+</sup>:Ga-rich BGG glass
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Efficient lasing of Ga-rich BGG bulk glasses doped with Tm 3+ is demonstrated. Two BGG bulk samples with Tm 3+ ion concentrations of 1.27×10 20 cm −3 and 2.54×10 20 cm −3 were tested for their laser performance. In-band pumping was realized using a continuous-wave (CW) homemade Er-doped fiber laser at 1600 nm. A maximum slope efficiency of 27.7% was demonstrated with respect to the absorbed pump power. The emission cross-section was retrieved from the laser efficiency data for three different lasing wavelengths and compared with the theoretical calculations. The power scaling potential of the Tm 3+ :BGG glass was investigated and a maximum output power of 0.8 W was achieved.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it