MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4397002788 · doi:10.1142/s0129183124501675

Exploring the dynamics of a four-dimensional Chua-like system: Numerical simulations and hardware investigations

2024· article· en· W4397002788 on OpenAlexaff
Vinicius F. R. Antunes, Cesar Manchein, Holokx A. Albuquerque, Luis Fernando Mello, Anderson Hoff

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Modern Physics C · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum chaos and dynamical systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas GeraisConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
KeywordsComputer scienceDynamics (music)Statistical physicsComputational sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work, we employ simulations to investigate deterministic and stochastic dynamics of a system governed by four coupled nonlinear ordinary differential equations (ODEs) derived from the canonical three-dimensional Chua model, replacing the piecewise nonlinearity with a cubic function. We employed two simulation approaches: (i) using software — where we performed numerical simulations (digital computation) in the ODEs model, and (ii) using hardware — where we performed experimental studies (analog computation) in the ODEs model. In the initial software-based approach for simulations, we performed stability and bifurcation analyses of the trivial equilibrium point, which were analytically conducted, along with the numerical continuation method. We solved the model using digital computation and explored its intricate dynamical behavior through nonlinear dynamics techniques applied to the parameter planes. In the second approach, employing hardware for simulations through analog computation, we designed an electronic circuit using analog electronics to solve the model in a continuous-time integration. The experimental setup mirrored the numerical simulations, yielding comparable results in terms of dynamical behaviors. This study underscores significant agreement between numerical and experimental findings, highlighting the robustness of the model across digital and analog contexts and offering practical insights into the various nonlinear dynamics presented in this system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.793
Threshold uncertainty score0.324

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Modern Physics CSame topicQuantum chaos and dynamical systemsFrench-language works237,207