MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4397003364 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.109.174113

Interatomic potential for sodium and chlorine in both neutral and ionic states

2024· article· en· W4397003364 on OpenAlexafffund
Hao Sun, Christopher I. Maxwell, E. Torres, Laurent Karim Béland

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. B./Physical review. B · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicThermal and Kinetic Analysis
Canadian institutionsCanadian Nuclear LaboratoriesQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAtomic Energy of Canada Limited
KeywordsIonic bondingChlorineInteratomic potentialSodiumIonic potentialChemical physicsChemistryIonInorganic chemistryMaterials scienceComputational chemistryMolecular dynamicsOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Molten salts could play an important role in energy storage, in the form of liquid batteries, and heat storage for solar and nuclear power. However, their widespread application is hindered by a limited understanding of the mechanisms by which they corrode metallic containers. This knowledge gap necessitates atomic-scale studies on salt-metal interactions. Molecular dynamics simulations are well suited for such research but require interatomic potential capable of accurately modeling both ionic and neutral states of salt and metal elements. Herein, we developed a moment tensor potential (MTP) with this capability, employing a small-cell training approach. The proposed MTP is compact: It is described by 449 parameters fitted on 609 configurations; 30% of these are one- or two-atom configurations. Extensive testing of our MTP points to a high-fidelity description of the structural and transport properties of solid/liquid Na, gaseous Cl, and crystalline/molten NaCl. Furthermore, we applied this MTP to calculate the standard reduction potential and solubility limit of Na in molten NaCl, achieving results that closely align with experimental and ab initio simulation data. This approach offers a robust framework for exploring the electrochemical and physical properties of molten salts across various compositions and solutes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. B./Physical review. BSame topicThermal and Kinetic AnalysisFrench-language works237,207