MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4397011893 · doi:10.33757/jik.v8i1.699

Pengaruh Dukungan Keluarga Terhadap Pemberian ASI Eksklusif Di Wilayah Kerja Puskesmas Air Dingin Kota Padang Kota Padang

2024· article· id· W4397011893 on OpenAlexaff
Fatmi Nirmala Sari, Binarni Suhertusi

Bibliographic record

VenueJIK JURNAL ILMU KESEHATAN · 2024
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldMedicine
TopicPublic Health and Nutrition
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 33 Tahun 2012 tentang Pemberian Air Susu Ibu Eksklusif, dimana ASI adalah Air Susu Ibu yang diberikan kepada bayi sejak dilahirkan selama enam bulan, tanpa menambahkan dan mengganti dengan makanan atau minuman lain kecuali obat, vitamin dan mineral (Kemenkes, 2017). Dalam pemberian ASI Eksklusif ada beberapa kendala seperti : persepsi bayi yang tidak kenyang 29 %, masalah kesehatan ibu 26 %, takut bayi menjadi ketergantungan ASI 26 %, tekanan dari ibu mertua 25 %, nyeri di payudara 25 %, dan ibu kembali bekerja 24 %, (Bonia et al, 2013). Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk melihat pengaruh dukungan keluarga terhadap pemberian ASI Eksklusif. Jenis penelitian ini adalah observasional analitik dengan menggunakan desain case control . Sampel dalam penelitian ini adalah ibu yang memiliki bayi usia 6-12 bulan yang berjumlah 62 orang di wilayah kerja puskesmas Air Dingin Kota Padang. Hasil dari penelitian di dapatkan bahwa ada hubungan yang bermakna antara dukungan keluarga dengan pemberian ASI Eksklusif yang ditunjukkan dengan nilai p <0.05. Disarankan kepada tenaga kesehatan yang bertugas serta kader untuk lebih memotivasi ibu dan keluarga dalam memberikan ASI Eksklusif bagi bayi agar dapat mempunyai bayi yang sehat

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJIK JURNAL ILMU KESEHATANSame topicPublic Health and NutritionFrench-language works237,207