Studi Kajian Literatur: Pengaruh Keberadaan Logam Berat Terhadap Tingkat Kesuburan Tanah di Indonesia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Penelitian ini dilakukan di Kendari, Sulawesi Tenggara. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui bagaimana pengaruh keberadaan logam berat terhadap tingkat kesuburan tanah di Indonesia. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini yaitu pengkajian literatur dengan mengumpulkan beberapa data sekunder dari berbagai penelitian yang telah dilakukan. Hasil penelitian menunjukan logam berat terakumulasi di dalam tanah pada batas wajar hingga melebihi batas ambang dan berpengaruh signifikan terhadap tingkat kesuburan tanah. Logam berat yang telah melewati ambang batas keberadaan di dalam tanah oleh Ministry of State for Population and Enviromental of Indonesia, and Dalhousie, University Canada, dapat menyebabkan turunnya tingkat kesuburan terhadap tanah, bersifat toksik dan dapat berakibat buruk terhadap kesehatan manusia. Sedangkan untuk logam berat yang masih berada di bawah ambang batas, bersifat aman dan memiliki pengaruh yang cukup baik terhadap tingkat kesuburan tanah.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".