MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4397017528 · doi:10.1016/j.cities.2024.105100

Pandemic fatigue? Insights from geotagged tweets on the spatiotemporal evolution of mental health in Canadian cities during COVID-19

2024· article· en· W4397017528 on OpenAlex
Charlotte Zhuoran Pan, Yiqing Wu, Siqin Wang, Jue Wang, Michael A. Chapman, Liqiang Zhang, Sabrina L. Li

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueCities · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMental Health via Writing
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan UniversityUniversity of TorontoUniversity of Waterloo
FundersUniversity of Waterloo
KeywordsCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Pandemic2019-20 coronavirus outbreakSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Mental healthGeographyData scienceEconomic geographyComputer sciencePsychologyVirologyMedicinePsychiatryDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

While COVID-19 is no longer a global pandemic, its enduring effects on mental health persist. This is the first study to quantify the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on population mental health in major Canadian cities. We track mental health dynamics of urban Canadian regions by monitoring the sentiment polarity dynamics, emotion trends, and top keywords of COVID-19 related discussions on Twitter (now X) from 2020 to 2022. Using over 430,000 geo-tagged posts, we combined geospatial mapping, machine learning, and social sensing to assess spatiotemporal variation in mental wellbeing across cities, interpreting underlying key factors and events that drove the mental “re-start” of a post-pandemic society. We found that early spring 2020 to summer 2021 was associated with increasing optimism, which progressed to a decline that persisted until the end of 2022. We observed spatial inequalities in population mental health across and within Vancouver, Calgary, Edmonton, Toronto, and Ottawa-Gatineau, which are predominantly English-speaking regions, and Montréal, a bilingual French-English region. In comparison to other English-speaking cities in the east coast, Toronto's maximum sentiment score was the lowest. Edmonton's maximum sentiment score was the lowest among all cities. Our results suggest that boosting public confidence and rebuilding psychological resilience are important in a post-pandemic era, and that interventions should be considered to address pandemic fatigue. • Over 430,000 geo-tagged X posts were used to track mental health trends across six major cities using GIS and machine learning. • Our kernel density heatmap illustrated that people express more optimism in areas with more open blue and green space. • The lowest monthly sentiment score in our sentiment polarity detection aligned with the timing of the Freedom Convoy protests. • The keyword "vaccination" prompted strong sentiment from both proponents and opponents of vaccination during the second wave. • There is a strong link between financial support programs and mental wellness during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.259
Threshold uncertainty score0.719

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it