Peristaltic pumping down a porous conduit
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A theoretical analysis is presented of peristaltic pumping down a narrow conduit with permeable walls, motivated by the flushing action of lugworms and other marine organisms in sandy burrows. Flow in the conduit is dealt with using lubrication theory; the leakage into the surrounding medium is taken into account by exploiting slender-body theory to solve the associated Darcy problem. By adopting a model for the local force balance on the pumping surface, we bridge between the limits in which the pump operates with either fixed load or displacement. In the latter limit we characterize peristaltic waves with either fixed form or ones that partially collapse the conduit. We construct pump characteristics (the relation between the mean flux and net pressure drop) when the burrow wall is impermeable and pressures are fixed at each end, and compare the results with existing laboratory experiments performed on lugworms. We then consider how the peristaltic dynamics is changed when the wall is made permeable. Last, we consider pumping along an impermeable burrow into a leaky head shaft. The results reveal that the permeability of the conduit wall or end can greatly impact the direction and strength of the recirculating flow.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".