Investigating Hydrogen Bonding in Quinoxaline-Based Thermally Activated Delayed Fluorescent Materials
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In recent years, hydrogen bonding (H bonding) as an intramolecular locking strategy has been proposed to enhance photoluminescence, color purity, and photostability in thermally activated delayed fluorescence (TADF) materials. Rigidification as a design strategy is particularly relevant when using electron-deficient N -heterocycles as electron acceptors, because these materials often suffer from poor performance as orange to near-infrared emitters as a result of the energy gap law. To critically evaluate the presence of H bonding in such materials, two TADF-active donor–acceptor dyads, ACR–DQ and ACR–PQ, were synthesized. Despite their potential sites for intramolecular H bonding and emissions spanning yellow to deep red, computational analyses (including frequency, natural bond orbital, non-covalent interaction, and potential energy surface assessments) and crystal structure examinations collectively suggest the absence of H bonding in these materials. Our results indicate that invoking intramolecular H bonding should be done with caution in the design of rigidified TADF materials.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".