MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4397024735 · doi:10.1681/asn.20223311s1302c

REVEAL-CKD: Management and Monitoring of Patients With CKD Stage 3 in France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the United States

2022· article· en· W4397024735 on OpenAlexaff
Navdeep Tangri, Markus P. Schneider, Jean Blaise J. Virgitti, Luca De Nicola, Emily Peach, Salvatore Barone, Matthew Arnold, Hungta Chen, Krister Järbrink, Pam R. Kushner

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStage (stratigraphy)MedicineKidney diseaseIntensive care medicineInternal medicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is vastly under-recognised yet affects 11.1% of the global population. Early diagnosis and active management can slow disease progression. This study assessed CKD management and monitoring in patients with CKD stage 3. Methods: REVEAL-CKD is a multi-national, observational study, using medical record and claims data from the general population. Data were extracted from six databases from France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the USA. Included patients were aged ≥18 years with 2 consecutive eGFR values ≥30 and <60 mL/min/1.73m2 recorded 91-730 days apart between 2015-2020. The date of the second qualifying eGFR was the index date. Patients with no CKD diagnosis code before and up to 6 months after index were considered undiagnosed. Data on selected quality indicators were extracted from 6-months post-index and the proportion of diagnosed and undiagnosed patients meeting these indicators was calculated. Results: Across the six databases cohort sizes were 20,012-250,879 patients with mean ages of 71-80 years; 41.9-52.9% were male, and median index eGFR was 49-52 mL/min/1.73m2. Prevalence of undiagnosed CKD ranged from 61.6 to 95.5%. UACR monitoring and treatment with SGLT2i was low across databases; UACR was notably 3-fold higher for patients with diagnosed CKD in Japan. Across all countries, blood pressure monitoring, and treatment with ACEi/ARB and statins was greater in patients with diagnosed CKD (Image 1). Conclusions: In five countries, a large proportion of patients with CKD stage 3 are undiagnosed and do not receive timely CKD management and monitoring, however, a greater proportion of patients meet care quality indicators when they have a CKD diagnosis. There is a clear need to proactively diagnose early-stage CKD so that patients can receive guideline-directed monitoring and treatments to improve outcomes. Funding: Commercial Support - AstraZeneca

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.109
Threshold uncertainty score0.217

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Society of NephrologySame topicBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesFrench-language works237,207