A new analytical wind turbine wake model considering the effects of coriolis force and yawed conditions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Wind turbine wakes significantly affect power production and impose higher loads on downstream turbines. Therefore, the development of accurate and efficient wake models is important for optimizing wind farm layouts and predicting wind turbine performance. This study introduces a novel analytical wake model for yawed wind turbines that incorporates the effects of the Coriolis force. The wake deflection in the far wake region is derived through the application of the principles of mass and momentum conservation. In the near wake, the deflection is assumed to be linear with distance. A Gaussian distribution is assumed for the velocity deficit within the wind turbine wake. Two approaches have been proposed to estimate the onset of the far wake region. While the first approach employs a simplified empirical formula, the second approach utilizes an iteration-based method. The proposed analytical wake model has been validated against computational fluid dynamics (CFD) results. Subsequently, the effects of several important parameters on the wake deflection have been systematically investigated. Overall, the simulation results showed a satisfactory agreement between the CFD results and those obtained from the proposed model. Furthermore, the study concluded that the Coriolis force can exert significant effects on wake deflection, particularly in the far wake region, confirming previous findings from numerical simulations. Due to its simplicity and computational efficiency, the proposed model can be readily used in several applications, including wind farm layout optimization, control and risk assessment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".