MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4397033434 · doi:10.18192/rceh.v45i3.6799

Letradura, entendimiento y buen seso. El consejero regio en el Libro de los estados de Juan Manuel

2024· article· es· W4397033434 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mario Cossío Olavide

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Canadiense de Estudios Hispánicos · 2024
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedieval Iberian Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este artículo analiza la figura del consejero regio en el Libro de los estados de don Juan Manuel. A partir de las investigaciones de Fernando Gómez Redondo y Leonardo Funes, se propone que este personaje literario es el transmisor de la ideología del autor, la clerecía señorial. Para ello se estudia el contexto político de la obra, su relación con la literatura consiliar producida en Castilla en los siglos XIII y XIV y los principios orientadores del comportamiento transmitidos por el consejero – buen seso, entendimiento y letradura. Se concluye estableciendo que la figura y su mensaje didáctico constituyen una apelación directa a Alfonso XI en un intento de instituir un nuevo ordenamiento cortesano monárquico-nobiliario que restaure los poderes de la alta aristocracia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.778
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Canadiense de Estudios HispánicosSame topicMedieval Iberian StudiesFrench-language works237,207