MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4397034246 · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-55272-4

Creative Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Education

2024· book· en· W4397034246 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePalgrave studies in creativity and culture · 2024
Typebook
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEducational Technology and Pedagogy
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsPsychologyMathematics educationArtificial intelligenceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Paper in this product is recyclable.This book is a testament to the power of collaboration, drawing on the expertise of international and multidisciplinary researchers.The diverse backgrounds and experiences displayed reflect our concerted effort to bring much needed context to the existing research around AI in education.The editors would like to acknowledge the contributions and research of all the participating authors and extend our sincere gratitude for entrusting us with their work.We would also like to thank the learners whose voices and viewpoints we have strived to highlight and amplify.Finally, our thanks to the universities, research groups, companies and educational institutions with which the authors are affiliated, all of whom have been instrumental in the realisation of this project.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.146
Threshold uncertainty score0.771

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.391
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it