MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4397040337 · doi:10.1681/asn.20233411s11152d

Unveiling a Protective Role of Endomucin in Endothelial Cells During Kidney Allograft Rejection

2023· article· en· W4397040337 on OpenAlexaff
Ahmad Halawi, Connor J. O'Brien, Tamara Merhej, Nour K. Younis, Rania El Fekih, Sacha A. De Serres, Jamil Azzi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOrgan Donation and Transplantation
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKidneyMedicineGraft rejectionKidney transplantationPathologyInternal medicineTransplantation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Understanding the role of endothelial cells in autoimmune and alloimmune mediated kidney diseases promises to develop more targeted therapies. Our single nuclei RNA sequencing (snRNA seq) identified an unexpected role for endothelial cells in cellular rejection. Notably, we reported a novel role of endomucin (EMCN), a molecule known for its anti-adhesive and anti-inflammatory properties, in kidney allograft rejection. Methods: We performed snRNA seq of human kidney allografts with non-rejection, borderline rejection, and T-cell mediated rejection (TCMR) based on Banff criteria. We performed pathway analysis focusing on immune and endothelial cells. As validation for our endothelial cells findings, we isolated and cultured blood outgrowth endothelial cells (BOECs) from different patients using our optimized protocol (S Beland et al., JASN 2023). We stimulated BOECs with INFg, TNFa, and allogeneic PBMCs. We studied the expression of EMCN and ICAM1 over time under different stimulation using Flow cytometry. Results: Our snRNA seq showed that TCMR samples had enrichment for allograft rejection pathway, suggesting that our borderline sample reflects an early rejection. Hence, this allows for studying the early stages of rejection. Pathway analysis of endothelial cells (ECs) of borderline and non-rejecting samples showed that focal adhesion and IFN-gamma pathways were significantly enriched compared to TCMR. Major genes related to focal adhesion were upregulated in borderline, suggesting a role of focal adhesion as a physical obstacle to immune migration. ECs upregulated EMCN in early rejection, suggesting a critical role in protecting against T cell adhesion and infiltration in the allograft. EMCN was then downregulated when rejection advanced. Similarly, in our in vitro model, activated human ECs downregulated the constitutive expression of EMCN when stimulated with allogeneic PBMCs, contrary to ICAM1, which was significantly upregulated. This observation was not seen when ECs were stimulated by IFNg and TNFa, suggesting that the effect of immune cells on ECs is not mediated by these cytokines. Conclusions: Our data showed that late during rejection, focal adhesion and EMCN are downregulated in endothelial cells suggesting a possible role in protecting the graft from immune invasion and rejection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology→Same topicOrgan Donation and Transplantation→French-language works237,207→