MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4397040534 · doi:10.1681/asn.20233411s11138a

Dapagliflozin in Patients with Low and High uACR

2023· article· en· W4397040534 on OpenAlexaff
Navdeep Tangri, Maria Svensson, Johan Bodegård, Samuel Adamsson Eryd, Marcus Thuresson, Tadashi Sofue

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes Treatment and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDapagliflozinUrologyMedicineInternal medicineEndocrinologyDiabetes mellitusType 2 diabetes

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: We explored clinical outcomes in new users of dapagliflozin 10 mg with low urine albumin to creatinine ratio (uACR; 30-200 mg/g) and high uACR (≥ 200 mg/g) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), with and without type 2 diabetes (T2D). Methods: This study used claims data from the USA between 2021 and 2022. Patients with and without T2D who were new users of dapagliflozin 10 mg were indexed at treatment start and grouped according to baseline uACR (low or high). Patients on dialysis or immunosuppressive drugs or with polycystic kidney disease or stage 5 CKD were excluded. Incidence of hospitalization for cardiorenal events (CKD or heart failure) and atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD) were compared separately within non-T2D and T2D populations using age- and sex-adjusted survival regression. Results: In non-T2D patients, 332 (54%) new users of dapagliflozin had low uACR and 286 (46%) had high uACR. Corresponding numbers for patients with T2D were 1987 (53%) and 1741 (47%). New users of dapagliflozin with low and high uACR had similar baseline characteristics, both with and without T2D. In non-T2D patients, event rates for cardiorenal hospitalizations were similar in the low and high uACR groups (8.3 and 9.2 per 100 patient-years, respectively). There was no significant risk difference between low and high uACR (hazard ratio [HR] 1.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.54-2.49; Figure). Similar results were seen in patients with T2D (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.68-1.24). In contrast, the risk of ASCVD was significantly higher in patients with high uACR versus low uACR (HR 1.67, 95% CI 1.03-2.72). Conclusions: Dapagliflozin's beneficial effect on cardiorenal risks appeared similar in patients with low and high uACR independent of T2D. ASCVD risk remained higher in high versus low uACR patients. These findings suggest cardiorenal effectiveness of dapagliflozin in patients with CKD and low uACR, without T2D. Funding: Commercial Support - AstraZeneca

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology→Same topicDiabetes Treatment and Management→French-language works237,207→