Regulation of copper uptake by the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex in <i>Candida albicans</i> affects susceptibility to antifungal and oxidative stresses under hypoxia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Candida albicans is a human colonizer and also an opportunistic yeast occupying different niches that are mostly hypoxic. While hypoxia is the prevalent condition within the host, the machinery that integrates oxygen status to tune the fitness of fungal pathogens remains poorly characterized. Here, we uncovered that Snf5, a subunit of the chromatin remodeling complex SWI/SNF, is required to tolerate antifungal stress particularly under hypoxia. RNA-seq profiling of snf5 mutant exposed to amphotericin B and fluconazole under hypoxic conditions uncovered a signature that is reminiscent of copper (Cu) starvation. We found that under hypoxic and Cu-starved environments, Snf5 is critical for preserving Cu homeostasis and the transcriptional modulation of the Cu regulon. Furthermore, snf5 exhibits elevated levels of reactive oxygen species and an increased sensitivity to oxidative stress principally under hypoxia. Supplementing growth medium with Cu or increasing gene dosage of the Cu transporter CTR1 alleviated snf5 growth defect and attenuated reactive oxygen species levels in response to antifungal challenge. Genetic interaction analysis suggests that Snf5 and the bona fide Cu homeostasis regulator Mac1 function in separate pathways. Together, our data underlined a unique role of SWI/SNF complex as a potent regulator of Cu metabolism and antifungal stress under hypoxia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".