Implementing robust outlier detection to enhance estimation accuracy of GNSS-IR based seasonal snow depth retrievals
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Monitoring snow depth variations aligned with the seasonal cycle is crucial for studies on climate change and its impacts due to global warming. Especially in terms of snow hydrology, the determination and continuous monitoring of snow depth to determine snow water equivalent is a priority in climate, water science, drought, flood, and inundation prediction studies, particularly in the water cycle. Recently, the so-called Global Navigation Satellite Systems – Interferometric Reflectometry (GNSS-IR) method enables to extract environmental radiometric and geometric characteristics of surface where the signals transmitted from the satellites reflect. The reflected signal follows an extra path than the direct one and causes a major error source for accurate point positioning but a useful tool for sensing the environment. However, outliers remain a challenge in long-term GNSS-IR estimations. In this study, we proposed a median-based robust outlier detection (ROD) approach for identifying outliers in long-term GNSS-IR snow depth estimations. To validate our approach, we analysed 5-year GNSS L1 SNR and L2 SNR data from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2019 provided by AB33 and AB39 GNSS stations in Alaska, U.S.A. using the GNSS-IR method. We validated GNSS-IR estimations using snow depth measurements from the Coldfoot and Fort Yukon stations in the SNOTEL network. Applying ROD to long-term snow depth estimates increased the highest correlation from 91.58% to 94.93%, and reduced the lowest RMSE from 8.6 cm to 6.7 cm. In addition, the improvement rates calculated to assess the contribution of ROD to the results showed improvements of up to 6.9% in correlation and 26.1% in RMSE. Overall, the results demonstrate that ROD can be effectively used to detect outliers in long-term GNSS-IR snow depth time series.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".