MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4397046278 · doi:10.1681/asn.20223311s1890b

Virtual Mindfulness-Based Intervention for Hemodialysis Patients During COVID-19 for Chronic Pain, Stress, Anxiety, and Depression

2022· article· en· W4397046278 on OpenAlexaffabout
Mona Ben m’rad, Christina Rigas, Katie Bodenstein, Karin Cinalioglu, Maryse Gautier, Harmehr Sekhon, Soham Rej

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicCOVID-19 and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsJewish General HospitalMcGill University Health CentreCégep Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMindfulnessAnxietyDepression (economics)HemodialysisCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Intervention (counseling)MedicineChronic painPhysical therapyClinical psychologyPsychologyInternal medicinePsychiatryDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Up to 50% of hemodialysis (HD) patients experience stress, anxiety, depression and chronic pain. With COVID-19, these symptoms are often exacerbated, and healthcare services are harder to access due to distancing measures and staff shortages. Mindfulness-based interventions (MI) are effective in reducing these symptoms. As part of our institution's standard clinical practice, we offered a virtually-delivered adapted Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) program to patients during their HD sessions given by an MBSR-certified psychologist. Case Description: A 35-year-old female, on HD since age 6, received five 20-40 minutes individual sessions of the virtual adapted MBSR program over 3 weeks. Perceived stress (Perceived Stress Scale), anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7), depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9) and chronic pain (Questionnaire de Saint-Antoine which is a french adapted version of the McGill pain questionary) levels were measured prior to starting the program, and 2 weeks after the last session. Over 5 weeks, the patient's stress decreased by 1 point (PSS = 17; PSS = 16, both moderate), anxiety decreased by 50% (GAD-7 = 14, moderate; GAD-7 = 7, mild), depression decreased by 15 points (PHQ-9 = 15, moderately severe; PHQ-9 = 0, none/mild), and chronic pain decreased by 19 points (QDSA = 22, moderate; QDSA = 3, mild). The patient also reported successful withdrawal from her restless-legs syndrome and insomnia medications, due to the MBSR breathing techniques she learnt for pain-management and sleep. Using the same MBSR techniques, 18 months after the program, she reported continuing self-management of her insomnia, chronic pain, and restless-legs syndrome without medication and feeling capable of coping with new health challenges, managing difficult emotions, and being able to calm and detach herself from worries and negative self-talk. Discussion: This case illustrates that an adapted MI delivered during HD sessions: 1) may help in managing symptoms of chronic pain, sleep disorders, anxiety and depression, 2) can be delivered virtually, 3) may be a viable short-term and long-term non-pharmacological alternative to managing symptoms in HD patients, for which polypharmacy is a high safety concern.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology→Same topicCOVID-19 and Mental Health→French-language works237,207→