IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COOPERATIVE LEARNING MODEL OF INDEX CARD MATCH TYPE TO IMPROVE STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The problem in this study is the result of studying the mathematics of students IV UPT elementary school district 211 Punnia Pinrang district. The purpose in this study is to know the application of a cooperative learning Model Index Card Match can enhance the process and rewards of students’ learning how to read and interpret data in the form of a bar diagram in country’s IV UPT SD 211 district Punnia Pinrang. The approach used is a qualitative approach and the type of research is a class action study (PTK). The performance of this study is done in 2cycles beginning with preaction activities, then each cycle consist of 4 stage that include planning execution, observation, ang reflection. Data obtained through observation techniques, tes result and documentation. Instruments on this research are observation sheets, learning test result and documentation. Research shows that in the I category comes from observation of teacher activity with sufficient category and enough student activity observation. Cycle II shows increased results from good category observation of teacher activity and student activity observation increased by good category. Studies related to the results of studying cycle I are only 10 people complete with sufficient categories. Cycle II had an improvement of 15 students with good ratings. The study concludes with cooperative learning models.Keywords: index card match; cooperative learning; learning outcomes Abstrak Masalah dalam penelitian ini adalah rendah hasil belajar Matematika siswa kelas IV UPT SD Negeri 211 Punnia Kab. Pinrang. Tujuan dalam penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui penerapan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Index Card Match dapat meningkatkan proses dan hasil belajar siswa tentang cara membaca dan menafsirkan data dalam bentuk diagram batang di kelas IV UPT SD Negeri 211 Punnia Kab.Pinrang. Pendekatan yang digunakan adalah pendekatan kualitatif dan jenis penelitian adalah penelitian tindakan kelas (PTK). Pelaksanaan tindakan penelitian ini dilakukan dalam 2 siklus diawali dengan kegiatan pra tindakan, kemudian pada setiap siklus terdiri dari 4 tahapan yang meliputi perencanaan, pelaksanaan, observasi, dan refleksi. Data diperoleh melalui teknik observasi, tes hasil belajar dan dokumentasi. Instrumen pada penelitian ini adalah lembar observasi, tes hasil belajar dan dokumentasi. Hasil penelitian menujukkan bahwa pada siklus I hasil observasi aktivitas guru dengan kategori cukup dan observasi aktivitas siswa dengan kategori cukup. Pada siklus II menunjukkan peningkatan hasil observasi aktivitas guru dengan kategori baik dan observasi aktivitas siswa meningkat dengan kategori baik. Hasil penelitian terkait dengan hasil belajar pada siklus I hanya 10 siswa yang tuntas dengan kategori cukup. Pada siklus II mengalami peningkatan menjadi 15 siswa yang tuntas dengan kategori baik. Simpulan penelitian ini adalah dengan menerapkan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Index Card Match (ICM) Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Mata Pelajaran Matematika Kelas IV UPT SD Negeri 211 Punnia Kab. Pinrang.Kata Kunci: index card match; pembelajaran kooperatif; hasil belajar
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it