MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4397292478 · doi:10.1021/prechem.4c00010

Structural Regulations of Layered Borates: From Centric Layers to Chiral Porous Layers

2024· article· en· W4397292478 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePrecision Chemistry · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCrystal Structures and Properties
Canadian institutionsInnovation Cluster (Canada)
FundersNational Science Fund for Distinguished Young ScholarsNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsCationic polymerizationHydrothermal circulationCrystallographyBoronCluster (spacecraft)TemplateMaterials sciencePorosityHydrothermal synthesisChemical engineeringChemistryNanotechnologyPolymer chemistryComposite materialOrganic chemistryComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Three pentaborates were made by precise structural regulations under hydrothermal conditions, namely, K 2 Cs[B 5 O 8 (OH)]·0.5CO 3 ( 1 ), KNa 4 Cs[B 5 O 8 (OH)] 2 ·2OH ( 2 ), and NaBa[B 5 O 8.5 (OH)] ( 3 ). Compound 1 features the typical 2D layers constructed from the four-connected B 5 O 10 (OH) clusters. By adjustment of the reactants and pH values of the systems to remove interlayered CO 3 2– groups, the centric layers in 1 were transformed to the chiral layers of 2 . By further adjusting cationic templates based on host–guest charge matching, the B 5 O 10 (OH) cluster unit was transformed to B 5 O 11 (OH), which built the chiral porous layers of 3 . The chiral compounds 2 and 3 exhibit moderate second harmonic generation (SHG) responses of 1.1 and 1.7 times that of KDP (KH 2 PO 4 ). The structural regulations actualize the evolutions on both structural symmetries and dimensions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it