Comprehensive evaluation of a new automatic scoring system for cleanliness assessment in video capsule endoscopy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A reliable, quick‐to‐assess, and automatic scoring system for cleanliness assessment in video capsule endoscopy (VCE) is presently not available. The present study proposes an approach to automatically assess the cleanliness in VCE frames as per the latest scoring system, that is, Korea‐Canada (KODA). First, a new multi‐label frame dataset containing medical scores of 28 VCE videos was generated through the proposed mobile‐based application called Artificial Intelligence‐KODA (AI‐KODA) score. The scores were saved automatically in real‐time through the application. The generated dataset was transformed into three datasets based on the scores, and each of the dataset was then randomly split into train:validate:test ratio of 60:20:20. Second, a comprehensive evaluation, interpretation, and benchmarking of the three classification tasks were performed with the help of eight transfer learning algorithms on NVIDIA RTX A5000 workstation. Thorough analysis indicates that AI‐KODA utilized with AI is reliable, quick‐to‐access, and free from observer bias. It promotes automatic scoring system for cleanliness assessment in VCE. The meta‐data is available here ( link ).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.017 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".