MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4398142280 · doi:10.1101/2024.05.19.24307585

Leveraging regulatory monitoring data for quantitative microbial risk assessment of <i>Legionella pneumophila</i> in cooling towers

2024· preprint· en· W4398142280 on OpenAlexaffabout
Émile Sylvestre, Dominique Charron, Xavier Lefebvre, Émilie Bédard, Michèle Prévost

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFecal contamination and water quality
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique MontréalNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLegionella pneumophilaLegionellaEnvironmental scienceBiologyBacteria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Cooling towers are critical engineered water systems for air conditioning and refrigeration but can create favorable conditions for Legionella pneumophila growth and aerosolization. Human exposure to L. pneumophila -contaminated aerosols can cause Legionnaire’s disease. Routine monitoring of L. pneumophila in cooling towers offers possibilities to develop quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) to guide system design, operation, control, and maintenance. Here, we used the regulatory monitoring database from Quebec, Canada, to develop statistical models for predicting L. pneumophila concentration variability in cooling towers and integrate these models into a screening-level QMRA to predict human health risks. Analysis of 105,463 monthly L. pneumophila test results revealed that the exceedance rate of the 10 4 colony forming unit (CFU) per liter threshold was constant at 10% from 2016 to 2020, emphasizing the need to better validate the efficacy of corrective measures following the threshold exceedances. Among 2,852 cooling towers, 51.2% reported no detections, 38.5% had up to nine positives, and 10.2% over ten. The gamma or the lognormal distributions adequately described site-specific variations in L. pneumophila concentrations, but parametric uncertainty was very high for the lognormal distribution. We showed that rigorous model comparison is essential to predict peak concentrations accurately. Using QMRA, we found that, to meet a health-based target of 10 -6 DALY/pers.-year for clinical severity infections, an average L. pneumophila concentration below 1.4 × 10 4 CFU L -1 should be maintained in cooling towers. We identified 137 cooling towers at risk of exceeding this limit, primarily due to the observation or prediction of rare peak concentrations above 10 5 CFU L -1 . Effective mitigation of those peaks is critical to controlling public health risks associated with L. pneumophila .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.438
Threshold uncertainty score0.870

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxivSame topicFecal contamination and water qualityFrench-language works237,207