MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4398142670 · doi:10.1080/03081060.2024.2354492

Development of a dynamic traffic microsimulator for on-demand transit operations within an integrated modelling system

2024· article· en· W4398142670 on OpenAlexaffabout
Md Asif Hasan Anik, Muhammad Ali Nayeem, Muhammad Ahsanul Habib

Bibliographic record

VenueTransportation Planning and Technology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTransportation Planning and Optimization
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransit (satellite)Transport engineeringTransit systemComputer sciencePublic transportEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study develops an intelligent dynamic agent-based microsimulation (iDAMS) module for on-demand transit (ODT) operations within an integrated transport, land-use and energy (iTLE) model. A real-time optimization component within the iDAMS is formulated by the utilization of travelling salesman problem and simulated annealing metaheuristics that perform dynamic passenger-vehicle assignment. It simulates ODT operations for meeting the 24-hour auto-trip demand of Halifax, Canada, to compare the performance of the proposed system with personal cars (PCs). The optimization objectives are to determine the optimal fleet size and seat capacity that satisfies maximum trip requests while minimizing waiting time, travel time and vehicle kilometres travelled (VKT). Simulation results indicate that the ODT system can deliver service similar to PCs in Halifax while decreasing cost and emissions (13% reduction in VKT). The tools developed in this research will provide transit planners ability to conduct ODT scenario simulation and test system performance in real time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransportation Planning and TechnologySame topicTransportation Planning and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207