MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4398144153 · doi:10.56771/jsmcah.v3.94

The Increasing Adoption Potential of Undersocialized Cats and Kittens: Blessing or Curse?

2024· article· en· W4398144153 on OpenAlexaff
JJ Ellis, Nicole M. Furgala, K.J. Janke

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Shelter Medicine and Community Animal Health · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHuman-Animal Interaction Studies
Canadian institutionsWildlife Conservation Society Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlessingCurseCATSMedicinePhilosophyTheologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The most appropriate management strategy for a cat entering a shelter environment varies based on many factors. Perhaps the most important of these is the cat's level of socialization to people. For unsocialized/poorly socialized cats, pathways such as TNR or alternative placement are typically considered more appropriate for their quality of life. This is particularly true for older cats, outside of the socialization phase. However, as supply of cats have declined and rates of pet ownership have increased, there is increasing pressure for shelters to find homes for cats with socialization histories that would not have been deemed adoptable previously, and adopters are more willing to adopt poorly socialized cats. There has been no investigation of the well-being of poorly socialized cats in their adoptive homes or the experience of these adopters. Adopters of 57 adult cats identified as undersocialized and 155 control cats (not suspected of being undersocialized) were surveyed about their cat’s behaviour and their own satisfaction. Control cats were rated as less fearful, more affectionate, more likely to engage when approached (by either a stranger or their adopter), and more likely to enjoy petting (by either a stranger or their adopter) than undesocialized cats. Owners of control cats also reported greater satisfaction and were more likely to state that their cat would be happier in a home environment than regularly fed outdoors. Adopters of 134 kittens identified as undersocialized and 591 control kittens (not suspected of being undersocialized) were surveyed about their kitten’s behaviour and their own satisfaction. In this survey, control kittens were rated as less fearful, and more likely to engage when approached by a stranger or enjoy a stranger petting them, but there was no difference in ratings of affection, relationship with their owner (either by engaging when approached or enjoyment of petting), adopter satisfaction, or what environment the adopter states the kitten would be happier. Results suggest that although it is becoming more possible to place undersocialized cats in homes, these environments may not be in the best interests of the cats’ or adopters’ quality-of-life. Results for undersocialized kittens suggest that while they may still be prone to fear, particularly towards strangers, both the kitten and the owners have good quality-of-life and satisfaction post-adoption.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.800
Threshold uncertainty score0.406

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.429
Teacher spread0.354 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Shelter Medicine and Community Animal HealthSame topicHuman-Animal Interaction StudiesFrench-language works237,207