Comparing the mean inner potential of Zn-VI semiconductor nanowires using off-axis electron holography
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The mean inner potential (MIP), V 0 , for a series of Zn group VI semiconductor nanostructures were measured experimentally using off-axis electron holography. Values for ZnS, ZnTe and ZnO were remeasured and new values were added for ZnSe and ZnSSe nanowires. We confirm that the MIP increases non-linearly with mass density beginning at 12.4 ± 0.2 V for the lowest density ZnS and slowly increasing with composition to 12.9 ± 0.2 V for ZnSe, more rapidly for ZnTe and with a significant increase to 14.8 ± 0.3 V for ZnO with the highest density. Published results from DFT calculations compared well to these measurements with similar trends apparent for other cation families such as the Ga-III-V.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it