MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Comprehensive analysis on three-phase imbalance management technology of low-voltage distribution network

2024· article· en· W4398144486 on OpenAlexaff
Yihao Dong, Xiaohan Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied and Computational Engineering · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Systems and Technologies
Canadian institutionsLa Cité Collégiale
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRenewable energyWind powerPower electronicsEnvironmental economicsAutomotive engineeringReliability (semiconductor)ElectronicsPower (physics)Three-phaseGreenhouse gasElectrical engineeringEngineeringReliability engineeringEnvironmental scienceVoltageEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Energy production and use is one of the major sources of global greenhouse gas emissions. To combat climate change, many countries and organizations are pushing to reduce the use of fossil fuels, and the use of renewable energy sources such as solar, wind, and hydro is growing rapidly. The conversion of these renewable energy into electricity requires a large amount of power electronics. Power electronics have higher energy conversion efficiency, greater adjustability and control, and smaller size and weight than traditional generators. These characteristics make power electronic equipment have a wide range of application prospects in the field of energy conversion and power control. There may be cost, reliability, debugging, and three-phase imbalance issues. Based on the harm of three-phase imbalance to the economic operation and safe and stable operation of distribution network, the importance of three-phase imbalance in low-voltage distribution network is expounded, and the relationship between three-phase unbalance current and power factor is elaborated on the construction of three-phase imbalance. Reduce the harm of three-phase imbalance to the distribution network and reduce the loss of distribution network lines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied and Computational EngineeringSame topicPower Systems and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207