MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4398146060 · doi:10.14740/jcs477

Applying Bloom’s Taxonomy in Orthopedic Clinical Education: Examples for Daily Practice

2024· article· en· W4398146060 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Wisam Suhail Al Obaidi, Faiz Tuma

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Current Surgery · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInnovations in Medical Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrthopedic surgeryBloomTaxonomy (biology)MedicineClinical PracticeSurgeryPhysical therapyBiologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bloom¡¯s taxonomy has been widely used in setting curricula and guiding the main educational outcomes. However, its use in daily teaching activities has been limited. In the context of orthopedic clinical education, applying Bloom¡¯s taxonomy can help surgical educators design effective learning experiences for students. The taxonomy consists of six levels, starting from the basic level of remembering knowledge and moving up to higher levels of understanding, application, analysis, evaluation, and synthesis. Bloom¡¯s taxonomy in orthopedic clinical education can help learners develop a deep understanding of the subject matter and acquire the necessary skills to excel in their future clinical practice. J Curr Surg. 2024;14(1):1-4 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/jcs477

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.729
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.185
GPT teacher head0.475
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Current SurgerySame topicInnovations in Medical EducationFrench-language works237,207