MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4398148039 · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2024.02.053

Personalized Intervention Based on Early Detection of Atherosclerosis

2024· review· en· W4398148039 on OpenAlexaff
Rikke Vibeke Nielsen, Valentı́n Fuster, Henning Bundgaard, José J. Fuster, Amer M. Johri, Klaus F. Kofoed, Pamela S. Douglas, Axel Cosmus Pyndt Diederichsen, Michael D. Shapiro, Stephen J. Nicholls, Børge G. Nordestgaard, Jes S. Lindholt, Calum A. MacRae, Chun Yuan, David E. Newby, Elaine M. Urbina, Göran Bergström, Martin Ridderstråle, Matthew J. Budoff, Morten Bøttcher, Olli T. Raitakari, Thomas H. Hansen, Ulf Näslund, Henrik Sillesen, Nikolaj Eldrup, Borja Ibáñez

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American College of Cardiology · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNovo Nordisk FondenBritish Heart Foundation
KeywordsMedicineSubclinical infectionIntensive care medicineDiseaseMyocardial infarctionStroke (engine)Atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseaseIntervention (counseling)Precision medicineCardiologyInternal medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide and challenges the capacity of health care systems globally. Atherosclerosis is the underlying pathophysiological entity in two-thirds of patients with CVD. When considering that atherosclerosis develops over decades, there is potentially great opportunity for prevention of associated events such as myocardial infarction and stroke. Subclinical atherosclerosis has been identified in its early stages in young individuals; however, there is no consensus on how to prevent progression to symptomatic disease. Given the growing burden of CVD, a paradigm shift is required-moving from late management of atherosclerotic CVD to earlier detection during the subclinical phase with the goal of potential cure or prevention of events. Studies must focus on how precision medicine using imaging and circulating biomarkers may identify atherosclerosis earlier and determine whether such a paradigm shift would lead to overall cost savings for global health.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations70
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American College of CardiologySame topicCardiovascular Disease and AdiposityFrench-language works237,207