MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4398148743 · doi:10.1111/avsc.12781

Resistance against tree encroachment is driven by richness and identity of herbaceous resident species

2024· article· en· W4398148743 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Rolando Trejo‐Pérez, Pierre‐Luc Chagnon, Patrick Boivin, Jacques Brisson

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Vegetation Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEcology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSpecies richnessHerbaceous plantResistance (ecology)GeographyIdentity (music)EcologyTree (set theory)BiologyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Aims Herbaceous plant cover can be used to inhibit tree encroachment in many managed and semi‐natural grasslands. Ideally, herbaceous seed mixtures should reduce the establishment and growth of many invading tree species over several years. Theory predicts that invasion resistance can be maximized by both: (a) increasing the diversity (taxonomic and/or functional) of resident seed mixtures, and (b) including species that are especially efficient at blocking further colonizers. We established an experiment in a regularly mown old field within a deciduous forest region in southeastern Canada. Our overall goal was to examine the relative contribution of old field community composition and diversity (taxonomic and functional) to resistance against encroachment by two undesirable native tree species over time. Location Varennes, southern Québec, Canada (45°37′01.24″ N, 73°23′03.57″ W). Methods We tested our hypotheses by seeding experimental plots with different levels of taxonomic diversity (from one to nine species) and functional group richness (grasses, legumes, and forbs). Our herbaceous species comprised four native species and five introduced and naturalized species. We then seeded the plots with two model tree colonizers, Acer rubrum and Betula populifolia, during three consecutive years. We also transplanted seedlings of Acer and Betula to determine the effect of herbaceous diversity on post‐emergence growth and seedling survival. Results Overall, herbaceous species identity (presence and absence) better predicted the resistance of resident herbaceous seed mixtures to tree encroachment than the other diversity measures assessed in our study. Fast‐growing herbaceous species, such as Lolium, substantially inhibit resistance to woody encroachment in the first year. Achillea millefolium and Solidago canadensis were by far the most efficient in blocking tree seedling establishment and growth, particularly during the second and third years. These effects highlight the potential for a combination of fast‐growing species, along with slower‐growing but highly inhibitive species, as a way to limit tree encroachment in real field applications. Functional group richness was a poor predictor of tree encroachment. Species richness reduced tree encroachment, especially when considering a multidimensional tree encroachment index integrating all aspects of tree establishment and growth over the three years of our experiment. Conclusions Seeding highly inhibiting herbaceous species is the most efficient approach against specific tree invaders. However, it is difficult to implement in practice because it relies on a priori knowledge of the species’ inhibitory effects. In the absence of this knowledge, the taxonomic richness of seed mixtures should be increased to prevent tree encroachment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.096

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Vegetation ScienceSame topicEcology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesFrench-language works237,207