MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4398151028 · doi:10.1039/d4ta01942c

Beyond molecular structure: critically assessing machine learning for designing organic photovoltaic materials and devices

2024· article· en· W4398151028 on OpenAlexafffund
Martin Seifrid, Stanley Lo, Dylan G. Choi, Gary Tom, My Linh Le, Kunyu Li, Rahul Sankar, Hoai‐Thanh Vuong, Hiba Wakidi, Ahra Yi, Ziyue Zhu, Nora Schopp, Aaron Peng, Benjamin R. Luginbuhl, Thuc‐Quyen Nguyen, Alán Aspuru‐Guzik

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Materials Chemistry A · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMachine Learning in Materials Science
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Advanced ResearchVector InstituteUniversity of Toronto
FundersDivision of Materials ResearchOffice of Naval ResearchNatural Resources CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAir Force Office of Scientific ResearchDefense Advanced Research Projects AgencyVector InstituteNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhotovoltaic systemComputer scienceField (mathematics)Selection (genetic algorithm)NanotechnologySystems engineeringArtificial intelligenceMaterials scienceEngineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We assess state of machine learning for organic photovoltaic devices and data availability within the field, discuss best practices in representations and model selection, and release a comprehensive dataset of devices and fabrication conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.029
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.029
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.007
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Materials Chemistry ASame topicMachine Learning in Materials ScienceFrench-language works237,207