MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4398154257 · doi:10.7476/9786589524946.0007

Fortalecimento das ações ambientais em contexto universitário: experiência de uma intervenção participativa

2021· book-chapter· pt· W4398154257 on OpenAlexaff
Fernanda Cristina Miranda Ribeiro, Zanna Maria Rodrigues de Matos, Carlos César Uchôa de Lima, Ludmila Oliveira Holanda Cavalcante

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languagept
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental Sustainability and Education
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

IntroduçãoA Equipe de Educação Ambiental (EEA) atua na Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana (UEFS), Bahia, há quase trinta anos como uma estrutura educadora interdisciplinar.Entretanto, sua constituição foi um longo caminho, nem sempre tão fácil e marcado por desafios, avanços, dificuldades e estratégias de superação.A motivação inicial que deu origem à EEA surgiu da necessidade institucional de reverter uma prática nociva ao ambiente como, por exemplo, a queima dos resíduos gerados no campus universitário e que não condizia em nada com uma postura educativa.Portanto, a primeira e mais importante linha de atuação da EEA é a gestão ambiental do campus, materializada através de um projeto piloto intitulado "Coleta Seletiva e Reaproveitamento do Lixo do Campus" (NUNESMAIA, 1997;DIAS, 2003).Certamente que a trajetória da EEA, a qual acompanha o ritmo de crescimento da Universidade, ampliou, ao longo do tempo, o seu escopo de atuação para além da gestão dos resíduos da própria Universidade.Tal fato foi consequência também da incorporação de novos professores à equipe, os quais inseriram suas linhas de

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.005
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0020.009
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same topicEnvironmental Sustainability and EducationFrench-language works237,207