MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4398156589 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202449891

The accretion burst of the massive young stellar object G323.46−0.08

2024· preprint· en· W4398156589 on OpenAlexfundno aff
V. Wolf, B. Stecklum, A. Caratti o Garatti, P. A. Boley, Christian Fischer, Tim J. Harries, J. Eislöffel, H. Linz, A. Ahmadi, J. Kobus, X. Haubois, Albert Matter, P. Cruzalèbes

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAustralian Astronomical Optics-MacquarieScience and Technology Facilities CouncilInstitut sur la Nutrition et les Aliments FonctionnelsJet Propulsion LaboratoryCalifornia Institute of TechnologyCurtin University of TechnologySwinburne University of TechnologyDeutsches Zentrum für Luft- und RaumfahrtMonash UniversityNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationAustralian National UniversityEuropean Space Agency
KeywordsAstrophysicsObject (grammar)PhysicsAccretion (finance)Young stellar objectAstronomyAccretion discComputer scienceStar formationArtificial intelligenceStars

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Context.Accretion bursts from low-mass young stellar objects (YSOs) have been known for many decades. In recent years, the first accretion bursts of massive YSOs (MYSOs) have been observed. These phases of intense protostellar growth are of particular importance for studying massive star formation. Bursts of MYSOs are accompanied by flares of Class II methanol masers (hereafter masers), which are caused by an increase in exciting mid-infrared (MIR) emission. They can lead to long-lasting thermal afterglows of the dust continuum radiation visible at infrared (IR) and (sub)millimeter (hereafter (sub)mm) wavelengths. Furthermore, they might cause a scattered light echo. The G323.46−0.08 (hereafter G323) event, which shows all these features, extends the small sample of known MYSO bursts. Aims.Maser observations of the MYSO G323 show evidence of a flare, which was presumed to be caused by an accretion burst. This should be verified with IR data. We used time-dependent radiative transfer (TDRT) to characterize the heating and cooling timescales for eruptive MYSOs and to infer the main burst parameters. Methods.Burst light curves, as well as the pre-burst spectral energy distribution (SED) were established from archival IR data. The properties of the MYSO, including its circumstellar disk and envelope, were derived by using static radiative transfer modeling of pre-burst data. For the first time, TDRT was used to predict the temporal evolution of the SED. Observations with SOFIA/HAWC+ were performed to constrain the burst energy from the strength of the thermal afterglow. Image subtraction and ratioing were applied to reveal the light echo. Results.The G323 accretion burst is confirmed. It reached its peak in late 2013/early 2014 with aKs-band increase of ∼2.5 mag. BothKs-band and integrated maser flux densities follow an exponential decay. TDRT indicates that the duration of the thermal afterglow in the far-infrared (FIR) can exceed the burst duration by years. The latter was proved by SOFIA observations, which indicate a flux increase of (14.2 ± 4.6)% at 70 μm and (8.5 ± 6.1)% at 160 μm in 2022 (2 yr after the burst ended). A one-sided light echo emerged that was propagating into the interstellar medium. Conclusions.The burst origin of the G323 maser flare has been verified. TDRT simulations revealed the strong influence of the burst energetics and the local dust distribution on the strength and duration of the afterglow. The G323 burst is probably the most energetic MYSO burst that has been observed so far. Within 8.4 yr, an energy of (0.9−0.8+2.5) × 1047 erg was released. The short timescale points to the accretion of a compact body, while the burst energy corresponds to an accumulated mass of at least (7−6+20) MJupand possibly even more if the protostar is bloated. In this case, the accretion event might have triggered protostellar pulsations, which give rise to the observed maser periodicity. The associated IR light echo is the second observed from a MYSO burst.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and Astrophysics→Same topicAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations→French-language works237,207→