MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4398159283 · doi:10.1139/cjes-2023-0120

Polyphase formation of a Neoarchean auriferous fault zone network in the Michipicoten greenstone belt, southern Superior craton

2024· article· en· W4398159283 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Chong Ma, Bruno Lafrance, Jean-François Montreuil

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Earth Sciences · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsLaurentian University
FundersCanada First Research Excellence Fund
KeywordsGeologyGreenstone beltPolyphase systemCratonGeochemistryArcheanBanded iron formationPetrologySeismologyTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Correlating structurally distinctive fault zones for understanding an unknown deformation system at the regional scale remains a challenge for understanding orogenic evolution and gold endowment. The current study deals with this challenge in the southern Michipicoten greenstone belt (MGB) of the Superior craton focusing on a Neoarchean auriferous fault zone network. Three deformation events associated with episodic gold mineralization are revealed in the ca. 2745 Ma host granitoid: (1) northwest‒southeast shortening recorded by the subvertical Grace and Minto B fault zones and locally the inclined Jubilee and Hornblende fault zones; (2) top-to-north northeast strike–slip to oblique faulting indicated primarily by the dominant structures of the Jubilee and Hornblende fault zones; and (3) top-to-northeast extension demonstrated by the northeast-dipping Parkhill #4 and Cooper fault zones. Fault zone lithologies and mineral assemblages suggest that the localization of deformation for the formation of these fault zones was controlled by rheological heterogeneities and syn-deformation fluids. The first and second events are correlated with two shortening events in a gold-endowed, structurally, and kinematically distinctive deformation zone of the northern MGB. This correlation based on deformation processes suggests a larger footprint of gold mineralization associated with a regional deformation in the MGB and has implications for investigating structural evolution of orogens and orogenic gold mineralization in general.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.933
Threshold uncertainty score0.134

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Earth Sciences→Same topicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping→French-language works237,207→