MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4398160865 · doi:10.1609/aaaiss.v3i1.31253

Social Smarts with Tech Sparks: Harnessing LLMs for Youth Socioemotional Growth

2024· article· en· W4398160865 on OpenAlexaff
Kevin Vo

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the AAAI Symposium Series · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEngineering Education and Technology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSocioemotional selectivity theoryTransformative learningDisconnectionSocial emotional learningSocial competencePsychologyCompetence (human resources)Social changeSocial learningSocial skillsPublic relationsSocial psychologyPolitical scienceDevelopmental psychologyEconomic growthPedagogyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study proposal combines the transformative potential of GPT-4 with an innovative approach to learning social and emotional skills, offering a novel conversational aid designed to enhance adolescents' social competence, and ultimately combat social disconnection in the digital era.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the AAAI Symposium SeriesSame topicEngineering Education and TechnologyFrench-language works237,207