MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Transformación Digital y su Impacto en la Educación Superior: Competencias Tecnológicas para Docentes y Estudiantes en la Universidad Internacional San Isidro Labrador, Costa Rica.

2024· article· es· W4398161433 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
docente universitario e investigador. Doctorando Fernando González Chacón

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista El Labrador · 2024
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldComputer Science
TopicEducational Innovations and Technology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesGeographyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La presente investigación explora la transformación digital en la Universidad Internacional San Isidro Labrador en Costa Rica, centrándose en su impacto en los procesos pedagógicos y administrativos, y en la necesidad de desarrollar competencias tecnológicas en docentes y estudiantes. El objetivo general es evaluar cómo la digitalización afecta la educación superior y proponer estrategias para una adaptación efectiva al entorno digital. Mediante un enfoque metodológico mixto, que combina técnicas cuantitativas y cualitativas, se recopiló y analizó la información. Los hallazgos revelan una brecha significativa en la adopción y uso de tecnologías digitales, destacando la importancia de competencias tecnológicas específicas. Las conclusiones subrayan la necesidad de mejorar la infraestructura tecnológica, la capacitación en competencias digitales y la promoción de una cultura de innovación. Se recomienda la implementación de programas de formación continua y la evaluación constante de estrategias de digitalización.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.309
Threshold uncertainty score0.615

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0060.001
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista El LabradorSame topicEducational Innovations and TechnologyFrench-language works237,207