MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4398161650 · doi:10.1021/jacsau.4c00199

Designing Microporous Layers for Electrolyzers Using Stochastic Approach

2024· article· en· W4398161650 on OpenAlex
Jason Keonhag Lee

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJACS Au · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced battery technologies research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultiprotocol Label SwitchingMicroporous materialMaterials scienceSupercapacitorComputer scienceProcess engineeringBilayerNanotechnologyElectrodeElectrochemistryComposite materialEngineeringMembraneComputer networkQuality of serviceChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electrochemical energy conversion devices, such as water and carbon dioxide electrolyzers, offer significant advantages in achieving net-zero emissions and in mitigating further increases in global temperature. However, their widespread adoption necessitates enhancements in performance and durability. Microporous layers (MPLs) have been gaining attention as a promising means to enhance the performance and durability of membrane-electrode-assembly (MEA) based electrolyzers, but their nontrivial mechanisms and complexity in fabrication pose challenges for optimizing the microporous layer structure experimentally. This study introduces a stochastic model for generating MPLs in application to electrolyzers. The model produces 3D reconstructions of MPLs, with porosity and particle size as input parameters, and is capable of generating biased MPLs by taking the pre-existing 3D reconstruction as an input. The model applies a dilation and erosion algorithm to replicate sinter-necks formed in the MPL during the sintering process, and captures their impact on structural and transport properties. In this work, three types of MPLs are generated by using the presented model, which include single-layer MPLs, MPLs with pore formers, and bilayer MPLs. Surface roughness analysis and pore network simulations on the MPLs highlight the significance of particle size in the MPL design. Using finer particles at higher porosities are favored over using larger particles at lower porosities. Such findings are examples of the valuable insights offered from the presented stochastic model, and the model will guide seminal discovery of next-generation MPLs that will greatly progress the shift toward net-zero electrochemical energy conversion technologies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.822
Threshold uncertainty score0.563

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it