MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Secure Approach to Avoid Data Repetition in Cloud Storage Systems

2024· article· en· W4398163933 on OpenAlex
Ma Swedhaa, V. Sathya, M. Vanitha, T. Jothilakshmi

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCloud Data Security Solutions
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCloud computingCloud storageComputer scienceComputer data storageData securityInformation repositoryComputer securitySimple (philosophy)Data managementData integrityDatabaseDistributed computingEncryptionOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cloud Storage will be current data research and data management field in terms of security and elimination of repeated data-sets. In simple terms, this current research introduces a strong system called "Cloud-SecureDedupe(C-SD)". to make sure data is safe and cloud storage works well. The system helps with a common problem called data repetition, where the same information is stored more than once. " Cloud-SecureDedupe (SDP)" uses a safe method to solve this issue, making sure your data is reliable in cloud storage. It adds extra protection by using advanced techniques to keep important information secure. Additionally, it smartly identifies and removes any repeated data, not only making your data more secure but also saving space in the storage, so it's used more efficiently. The system has been carefully tested and proven to work well, ensuring that your experience with cloud storage is both safe and smooth.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.951
Threshold uncertainty score0.613

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCloud Data Security SolutionsFrench-language works237,207