MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Comparison of the Time-Course and Magnitude of Cardiorespiratory Responses to Superimposed Surgical Masks or N95 Respirators during 20-min Treadmill Walking

2024· article· en· W4398165475 on OpenAlexaff
Angela Galeos, Rodion Isakovich, Valerie C. Cates, Anthony L. Marullo, Nicholas D. J. Strzalkowski, Trevor A. Day

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysiology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Canadian institutionsMount Royal University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRespiratorCardiorespiratory fitnessTreadmillMedicinePhysical medicine and rehabilitationInternal medicineMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wearing medical barriers has recently expanded from healthcare to public settings, and could increase dead space and facilitate rebreathing of expired air resulting in heat accumulation, hypercapnia, and hypoxia, particularly during physical activity. We recently showed that participants wearing surgical masks (SM) and N95 respirators (N95) over 60-min during seated rest had mild and immediately reversible (a) increases face microclimate temperature, (b) increases in the pressure of end-tidal (P ET )CO 2 , (c) decreases in P ET O 2 , but (d) no differences in peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO 2 ). Previous publications showed conflicting results of superimposed barrier wearing during physical activity, and there are limited studies that assessed face microclimate temperature and end-tidal gases, particularly comparing superimposed SM and N95. We hypothesized that participants wearing SM and N95 will experience mild face microclimate hyperthermia, hypoxia, and hypercapnia during 3mph treadmill walking. Participants (n=18; 8F) randomly wore (a) no barrier (NB), (b) SM or (c) N95 during a 10-min standing baseline, 20-min treadmill walking (3 mph), and a 10-min standing recovery. We continuously measured face microclimate temperature (thermistor), end tidal gases (P ET CO 2 , P ET O 2 ; oro-nasal cannula), SpO 2 (peripheral pulse oximeter). Average 20-min P ET CO 2 (higher; p<0.0001, P=0.0001) and P ET O 2 (lower; P=0.0003, P=0.0178) were significantly from baseline for both SM and N95, respectively. The delta between the 20-min average compared to the baseline data was not statistically significant for P ET CO 2 or P ET O 2 in all three conditions, except for ΔP ET CO 2 NB vs. N95 (higher; P=0.0344). Additionally, there was no difference in SpO 2 across all barrier conditions during exercise. These mild physiological effects may account for qualitative reports of shortness of breath and increased perceived exertion while wearing barriers during physical activity. However, these effect-magnitudes are not physiologically-meaningful, and are immediately reversed upon cessation of exercise and/or barrier removal. NSERC. This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2024 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.837
Threshold uncertainty score0.323

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysiologySame topicCardiac Arrest and ResuscitationFrench-language works237,207