MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Effect of Sex on Sympatho-inhibitors and Non-inhibitor Phenotypes during Acute Hyperoxia

2024· article· en· W4398165828 on OpenAlexaff
Jinan Saboune, Charlotte W. Usselman, Margie H. Davenport, Craig D. Steinback

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysiology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory Support and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHyperoxiaPhenotypePharmacologyBiologyMedicineInternal medicinePhysiologyGeneticsLungGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Acute hyperoxia (i.e., breathing air consisting of 100% oxygen, O 2 ) reduces muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA), positioning hyperoxia as a potential anti-hypertensive therapeutic. However, the link between hyperoxia and MSNA has not been established in females. We tested the hypothesis that males would exhibit greater reductions in MSNA during hyperoxia than females. We tested healthy females (n=18, 27±5yr, body mass index [BMI] 23±3kg/m 2 ) and males (n=13, 27±5yr, 25±3kg/m 2 ) of similar age (P=0.99) and BMI (P=0.08). Integrated MSNA, blood pressure, and end-tidal O 2 (ET O2 ) and CO 2 (ET CO2 ) were measured during normal room air breathing (BSL; 3-min) and hyperoxic breathing (100% O 2 ; 3-min). Integrated MSNA was quantified as burst frequency (BF; bursts/min), amplitude (BA; a.u.), and total MSNA (a.u.); blood pressure was quantified as mean arterial pressure (MAP). Baseline MSNA BF was not different between females and males (24±7 vs 23±8 bursts/min, respectively, P=0.68); MAP was lower in females than males (85±7 vs 93±7 mmHg; p<0.01). Hyperoxia increased ET O2 (effect of cond: p<0.01) and reduced ET CO2 (effect of cond: p<0.01) in a manner similar between sexes for ET O2 (sex*cond: P=0.56) whereas ET CO2 decreased more in females than males (sex*cond: P=0.01). Overall, hyperoxia evoked reductions in MSNA BF (effect of cond: P=0.02) but not BA (effect of cond: P=0.80) or total MSNA (effect of cond: P=0.26). Nadir MSNA responses during hyperoxia unveiled sex differences insofar as total MSNA was reduced consistently only in males (sex*cond: P=0.04); within the females we observed the presence of sympatho-inhibitors and non-inhibitors. Whereas female and male inhibitors reduced total MSNA via substantial reductions in BF and non-significant reductions in BA, female non-inhibitors demonstrated limited reductions in BF (P=0.11 vs inhibitors) coupled with increases in BA (p<0.01 vs inhibitors), resulting in no net change in total MSNA (p<0.01 vs inhibitors). Overall, these findings indicate sex differences exist in the sympathetic response to hyperoxia, in marked variability in the female sympathetic response to acute hyperoxia. The Women and Children's Health Research Institute. This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2024 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysiologySame topicRespiratory Support and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207