MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

No sex differences in the cardiac responses during high altitude sojourn to 4300 m

2024· article· en· W4398166577 on OpenAlexaff
Molly R. Crew, A Burkhart, Carolyn R. Steffen, Denise L. Smith, Tom D. Brutsaert, Trevor A. Day, Wesley K. Lefferts

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysiology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHigh Altitude and Hypoxia
Canadian institutionsMount Royal University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEffects of high altitude on humansBiologyPhysiologyInternal medicineCardiologyDemographyMedicineAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ascent to high altitude reduces oxygen availability and provokes compensatory cardiovascular responses. Females may exhibit attenuated hypoxic ventilatory responses compared to males, which could subsequently exaggerate the cardiovascular response to high altitude among females. The purpose of this study was to examine sex differences in cardiac responses during high altitude sojourn in young, healthy males and females. We hypothesized that females would exhibit a greater reduction in arterial oxygen saturation, and greater cardiac dysfunction compared to males. 17 healthy adults (8 males, 24±4 yrs, BMI 25.7±3.1 kg/m 2 ; 9 females, 23±4 yrs, BMI 24.5±3.0 kg/m 2 ) underwent cardiac assessment via echocardiography at 1400 m and after an 8-day ascent to 4300 m. Left ventricular (LV) systolic function was assessed via ejection fraction and fractional shortening. Diastolic function was assessed as the ratio between early and late mitral filling velocities (E:A ratio). The subendocardial viability ratio (SEVR) was derived from carotid tonometry, and carotid pressure waves were integrated with echocardiography derived measures of left ventricular ejection to estimate a left ventricular pressure-volume loop and calculate stroke work. Ascent from 1400 m to 4300 m resulted in reduced end-tidal CO 2 (-Δ8±3 [males], -Δ8±2 mmHg [females], p<0.001), oxygen saturation (-Δ11±3 [males], -Δ11±5 % [females], p<0.001), and LV fractional shortening (-Δ7.9±7.5% [males] -Δ1.0±6.4 % [females], p=0.028) in both groups. Despite greater stroke work among males (p=0.002), high altitude-induced changes were not statistically different compared to females (+Δ35±184 [males], +Δ3±113 mL/mmHg [females]). Changes in LV ejection fraction (-Δ1.9±14.4 [males], -Δ1.5±18.7 % [females]) mitral E:A (-Δ0.33±0.53 [males], -Δ0.09±0.64 au [females]), and SEVR (-Δ0.06±0.33 [males], +Δ0.15±0.20 au [females]) from 1400 to 4300 m were not statistically different between sexes. Ascent from 1400 to 4300 m decreased end-tidal CO 2 , arterial oxygen saturation, and select metrics of LV systolic function (e.g., fractional shortening), but LV diastolic function, stroke work, and SEVR was preserved in both males and females. We observed no apparent sex differences in the effects of 8-day sojourn to 4300 m on arterial oxygen saturation, or cardiac systolic and diastolic function. Additional research is necessary to confirm these results in the context of longer-term altitude exposure and acclimatization, and in older populations (middle-aged and older adults). This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2024 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.863
Threshold uncertainty score0.353

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysiologySame topicHigh Altitude and HypoxiaFrench-language works237,207