MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Cardiac Sodium Channel Na<sub>v</sub>1.5 Arg222Gln Variant Induces a Sex-Specific Arrhythmia and Alters Mitochondrial Function

2024· article· en· W4398166760 on OpenAlexaffabout
Tim YT Lee, Kaley Hogarth, Elöd Z. Szabó, Jason T. Maynes

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysiology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSodium channelSodiumCardiac function curveInternal medicineFunction (biology)CardiologyCardiac arrhythmiaMitochondrionBiologyChemistryEndocrinologyCell biologyMedicineHeart failureAtrial fibrillation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Encoded by the SCN5A gene, cardiac Na v 1.5 sodium channels initiate the action potential to trigger a heartbeat. As the predominant sodium channel in the heart, variants can have devastating consequences, leading to potentially lethal arrhythmias. With the gain of function arginine to glutamine (Arg222Gln) variant in Na v 1.5, patients develop intermittent arrhythmias and dilated cardiomyopathy. The stress induced by chronic arrhythmias can trigger adverse metabolic reprogramming, exacerbating the underlying condition. We have generated a murine model harboring the human Arg222Gln variant where we observe that only males produce a clear observable arrhythmia. We hypothesize that the maladaptive metabolic response to the arrhythmia caused by the Arg222Gln variant maybe be a potential link to the sex differences. Methods: The human exon containing the Arg222Gln mutation was knocked into a murine model under the endogenous SCN5A promoter. Cellular metabolism (oxygen consumption) was measured using primary adult mouse cardiomyocytes (CMs) with the Seahorse XFe analyzer. Mitochondrial membrane potential was measured using ratiometric JC-1 dye and imaged on a scanning confocal microscope. Heart tissues were diced into 1mm 3 cubes and fixed to perform serial block face electron microscopy to obtain 3D structure of mitochondria and mitochondrial morphology. Western blots were used to detect protein levels. Results: Basal respiration of CMs were unchanged, however the maximal respiratory capacity of Arg222Gln males was significantly lower (116.9±13.5pmol O 2 /min, p&lt;0.05) compared to WT males (407.3±16.4pmol O 2 /min). There were no differences between WT females (451.4±22.4pmol O 2 /min) and Arg222Gln females (463.2±33.7pmol O 2 /min). JC-1 dye revealed that the Arg222Gln males (0.6213±0.0172 red/green ratio, p&lt;0.001) have significantly lowered mitochondrial polarization compared to WT males (0.7550 ±0.0257). There were no differences between WT females (0.6236±0.0154) and Arg222Gln females (0.6466±0.0139). Arg222Gln males have reduced mitochondria area (1.155±0.052μm 2 , p&lt;0.05) compared to WT males (1.332±0.060μm 2 ) and are more fragmented (p&lt;0.05). Electron transport chain complex protein levels and mitochondrial biomass measured by voltage dependent anion channel protein levels remain unchanged between WT males and Arg222Gln males (P&gt;0.05). The ratio of phosphorylated dynamin related (DRP) / total DRP protein levels were significantly higher in Arg222Gln males compared to WT males, indicative of mitochondrial fission (p&lt;0.05). Conclusion: We demonstrate evidence of a mitochondrial dysfunction in a murine model of arrhythmia caused by a gain of function Na v 1.5 variant, adversely affecting overall cellular metabolism and mitochondrial quality. Our data suggests that the difference in metabolic reprogramming could play a role in the cardioprotection against arrhythmia in Arg222Gln females or explain why Arg222Gln males are severely affected by the arrhythmia. Future experiments will aim to elucidate how the difference in sex affects cardiac metabolism in the context of Arg222Gln Na v 1.5 variant. This work was supported by a Canadian Institutes of Health Research Project Grant, the SickKids Foundation through the Curtis Joseph and Harold Groves Chair in Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (JTM) and the Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto through a Merit Award (JTM). TYTL is supported by the CIHR Canadian Graduate Scholarship — Doctoral Award. This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2024 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.926

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysiologySame topicRNA and protein synthesis mechanismsFrench-language works237,207