MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Large conducting airway luminal area is not different after initiating cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulatory modulator therapy

2024· article· en· W4398167109 on OpenAlexaff
Alex J. Miller, Richard T. Roden, Rachel E. Guyer, Paolo B. Dominelli, Juan G. Ripoll, Brian T. Welch, Michael J. Joyner

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysiology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAsthma and respiratory diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulatorCystic fibrosisAirwayMedicineTransmembrane proteinConductanceNeuroscienceBiologyInternal medicinePhysicsAnesthesiaReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a genetic disorder in which patients have dysfunctional cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulatory (CFTR) proteins in the lungs that disrupt ion regulation resulting in a thick, viscous mucus layer on the airway epithelium. Consequential poor mucociliary clearance leads to repeated infections and chronic inflammation contributing to bronchiectasis which is associated with increased airway luminal area. CFTR modulator therapy can improve and even restore the function and expression of a mutated CFTR gene which has been shown to improve sweat chloride levels and pulmonary symptoms rapidly. However, the effect of CFTR modulator therapy on large conducting airway luminal area is unclear. We compared large conducting airway luminal area in patients with CF before and after initiating CFTR modulator therapy. We hypothesized that airway luminal area would normalize (decrease) after initiating CFTR modulator therapy. Methods: Twenty-three patients with CF (32±15 years, 11 female) with computed tomography (CT) imaging of their lungs before and after initiating CFTR modulator therapy were included in analyses. In each patient we measured seven large conducting airways (trachea, left and right main bronchus, bronchus intermediate, left and right upper lobe, and left lower lobe) before and after CFTR modulator therapy initiation. To control the potential effect of height, airway luminal area (mm 2 ) was divided by patient height (cm). Paired t-tests compared differences between luminal area before after initiating CFTR modulator therapy. Results: Patients were taking CFTR modulator therapy for a median of 1.1 years (range: 22–2111 days) at the time of their CT imaging after initiating CFTR modulator therapy. Large conducting airway luminal area was not different before and after initiating CFTR modulator therapy in all seven airways: trachea (1.50±0.35 vs. 1.56±0.34 mm 2 /cm, p=0.14), right main bronchus (1.05±0.21 vs. 1.09±0.19 mm 2 /cm, p=0.11), bronchus intermediate (0.68±0.16 vs. 0.68±0.16 mm 2 /cm, p=0.54), right upper lobe (0.42±0.10 vs. 0.45±0.09 mm 2 /cm, p=0.27), left main bronchus (0.81±0.19 vs. 0.83±0.18 mm 2 /cm, p=0.21), left upper lobe (0.51±0.13 vs. 0.52±0.13 mm 2 /cm, p=0.45), and left lower lobe (0.44±0.11 vs. 0.46±0.10 mm 2 /cm, p=0.42). Conclusion: There was no change in large conducting airway luminal area after initiating CFTR modulator therapy suggesting CFTR modulator therapy may not reverse CF-associated airway luminal area changes. However, longitudinal analysis and investigation into the small airways are necessary for a comprehensive understanding of the effect of CFTR modulator therapy on airway luminal area changes. Funding: NIH (HL139854 to MJJ, HL131151 to SEB) and NSERC (PDF-577750-2023 to AHR). This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2024 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.379
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysiologySame topicAsthma and respiratory diseasesFrench-language works237,207