MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4398167363 · doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.l101503

Spin dependence of black hole ringdown nonlinearities

2024· article· en· W4398167363 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Jaime Redondo–Yuste, G. Carullo, Justin L. Ripley, Emanuele Berti, Vítor Cardoso

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D. · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEuropean Research CouncilAmaldi Research CenterInstitut Périmètre de physique théoriqueDepartament d'Innovació, Universitats i Empresa, Generalitat de CatalunyaMinistero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della RicercaNational Research FoundationHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeIndo-US Science and Technology ForumEuropean CommissionNational Science FoundationIndo-French Centre for the Promotion of Advanced ResearchMinistry of Colleges and UniversitiesGovernment of CanadaJohn Templeton FoundationHORIZON EUROPE Marie Sklodowska-Curie ActionsMinistero degli Affari Esteri e della Cooperazione InternazionaleSimons FoundationDanmarks GrundforskningsfondNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationVillum Fonden
KeywordsPhysicsSpinsBlack hole (networking)AmplitudeQuasinormal modeRotating black holeExtrapolationBinary black holeNumerical relativityConformal mapExcitationPerturbation theory (quantum mechanics)Quantum electrodynamicsTheory of relativityGravitationQuantum mechanicsGravitational waveCondensed matter physicsAngular momentumGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The nonlinear character of general relativity leaves its imprint in the coalescence of two black holes, from the inspiral to the final ringdown stage. To quantify the impact of nonlinearities, we work at second order in black hole perturbation theory and we study the excitation of second-order modes relative to the first-order modes that drive them as we vary the black hole spin and the initial data for the perturbations. The relative amplitude of second-order modes is only mildly dependent on the initial data that we consider, but it strongly decreases for large black hole spins. This implies that the extrapolation of calculations based on the Kerr--conformal field theory correspondence to subextremal Kerr black holes should be viewed with caution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.476
Teacher spread0.453 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations57
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D.Same topicPulsars and Gravitational Waves ResearchFrench-language works237,207