Association of self-reported pain with quality of life in resistant hypertensive patients / Associação da dor autorrelatada com a qualidade de vida no hipertenso resistente
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objetivo: analisar a associação da dor autorrelatada e a qualidade de vida de hipertensos resistentes no contexto da pandemia de Covid-19. Método: estudo transversal e analítico, realizado em hospital universitário, no período de janeiro a fevereiro de 2022. A coleta de dados deu-se por busca em prontuário e por contato telefônico, com a utilização dos Questionários de Dor de McGILL e Qualidade de Vida em Hipertensão Arterial (Minichal – Brasil). Na análise estatística foi usado o teste de Mann-Whitney e o coeficiente de Sperman (ρ). Resultados: predominância feminina (88,1%), com idade entre 50 e 70 anos (69,1%), com hipertensão arterial há mais de 20 anos (42,9%), estimativa de dor “leve a severa” (64,3%), boa qualidade de vida (47,6%), com associação significativa em hipertensos com colesterol total alto. Conclusão: identificação do perfil da amostra, associação da dor autorrelatada e a qualidade de vida de hipertensos resistentes no contexto da pandemia da Covid-19.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".