MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Does menthol independently modify thermoregulatory control during passive heat stress in humans?

2024· article· en· W4398167640 on OpenAlexaffabout
Mackenzie Nelson, Douglas Newhouse, KarLee Lefebvre, Nicholas Ravanelli

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysiology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicThermoregulation and physiological responses
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeat stressThermoregulationMentholBiologyNeurosciencePhysical medicine and rehabilitationMedicineChemistryEndocrinologyAnimal science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Physical cooling within the gastrointestinal (GI) tract attenuates sudomotor activity likely by activation of the cold-sensitive transient receptor potential melastatin 8 (TRPM8). In the absence of physical cooling, it remains unknown whether stimulation of TRPM8 receptors within the GI tract during heat stress alters sudomotor control. Objective and Hypothesis: The purpose of this study is to assess whether a TRPM8 agonist (e.g., menthol) independently modulates the sudomotor response during heat stress. Relative to 37°C water, It was hypothesized that menthol would i) delay the sweating onset, and ii) attenuate the sweating response during heat stress. Methods: To date, a total of 9 participants (5 females; 22±5 y; 72.7±10.5 kg; 1.8±0.1 m) have completed three passive heating protocols on separate days. The participant’s rectal temperature was increased by 1.0°C above baseline using a water perfused suit circulating 49°C water. Participants consumed 3.2 ml per kg of body mass of either: i) 37°C water (37C), ii) 1.5°C water (1.5C), or iii) 37°C menthol solution (0.05%, 37M), 5 minutes before passive heating, and following a 0.5°C and 1.0°C increase in rectal temperature. Mean skin temperature (4 sites) and local sweat rate of the forearm and forehead were recorded during the baseline period and passive heating protocol. Mean body temperature was calculated as the weighted average between skin (20%) and rectal (80%) temperature, and whole-body sweat rate expressed as the net difference in body mass relative to heating time (in g/h). Results: Mean body temperature at baseline was not different between the three conditions (37C: 36.21±0.41˚C, 1.5C: 36.24±0.38˚C, and 37M: 36.30±0.43˚C, P=0.32). Forearm sweating onset was attenuated with 37M (36.97±0.42˚C, P=0.04), and trending to be attenuated with 1.5C (36.96±0.26˚C, P=0.07) relative to 37C (36.69±0.40˚C). Similarly, forehead sweating onset was attenuated with 37M (36.95±0.44˚C, P=0.02), and trending to be attenuated with 1.5C (36.84±0.35˚C, P=0.09), relative to 37C (36.70±0.43˚C). Thermosensitivity was not different between all three fluid conditions for the arm (37C: 1.4±0.7 mg/cm 2 /min/˚C; 1.5C: 1.7±1.0 mg/cm 2 /min/˚C; 37M: 1.5±1.0 mg/cm 2 /min/˚C, P=0.59) and head (37C: 1.7±0.9 mg/cm 2 /min/˚C; 1.5C: 1.6±1.2 mg/cm 2 /min/˚C; 37M: 1.7±1.1 mg/cm 2 /min/˚C, P=0.88). Lastly, whole-body sweat rate was not significantly different between all three conditions (37C: 631±288 g/h; 1.5C: 580±270 g/h; 37M: 635±440 g/h, P=0.63). Conclusion: Preliminary results suggest that consumption of a TRPM8 agonist in advance of passive heat stress may attenuate the sudomotor onset similarly to 1.5˚C water relative to 37˚C. However, the sweating response remains largely unaffected during passive heat stress between all three fluids assessed. Funding: This research was supported by Dr. Nicholas Ravanelli’s Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Discovery Grant (PIN#2022-05096). This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2024 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.974
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysiologySame topicThermoregulation and physiological responsesFrench-language works237,207