MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4398168746 · doi:10.7202/1111340ar

Les impacts sociaux liés à l’aménagement du port de Kribi au Cameroun. L’exemple du programme de relocalisation de villages

2024· article· fr· W4398168746 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Christine Louise Ntyam, M. Simard

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Regional Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHydropower, Displacement, Environmental Impact
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHuman settlementPort (circuit theory)GeographyEconomic geographySettlement (finance)Regional scienceEnvironmental planningBusinessArchaeologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les impacts sociaux liés à l’aménagement du port de Kribi au Cameroun. L’exemple du programme de relocalisation de villages. Un article de la revue Canadian Journal of Regional Science / Revue canadienne des sciences régionales (Volume 47, numéro 1, 2024, p. 3-56) diffusée par la plateforme Érudit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.102
Threshold uncertainty score0.202

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.393
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Regional ScienceSame topicHydropower, Displacement, Environmental ImpactFrench-language works237,207