MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4398172487 · doi:10.1109/twc.2024.3400523

Reliable and Energy-Efficient Communications via Collaborative Beamforming for UAV Networks

2024· article· en· W4398172487 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUAV Applications and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaNational Research Foundation
KeywordsBeamformingComputer scienceEfficient energy useComputer networkWirelessTelecommunicationsElectrical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have been demonstrated to be a prominent component for wireless communications. In this work, we consider an emergency communication scenario wherein a UAV-based relay system collects data from ground users, and then uses different UAV-enabled virtual antenna arrays (UVAAs) to transmit the collected data to several remote base stations (BSs) via collaborative beamforming (CB). However, several adjacent aerial users (AUs) are carrying out other missions at the same time, which may be interfered by the signal transmitted by the UVAAs. Thus, we formulate a reliable and energy-efficient communication multi-objective optimization problem (RECMOP) to jointly maximize the minimum receiving signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the BSs, minimize the maximum average receiving SNR of the AUs, and minimize the propulsion power consumption of the UAVs, so that diminishing the energy cost while enhancing the system performance. The formulated RECMOP is intricate since it is proven to be NP-hard and non-convex. Therefore, an improved multi-objective gravitational search algorithm (IMOGSA) with several specific designs is proposed to handle the formulated problem. Simulation results manifest that the proposed IMOGSA can effectively solve the formulated RECMOP, and it outperforms other benchmarks in both smaller and larger scale UAV networks. Moreover, extended simulation demonstrates the robustness of the proposed CB-based approach under several unexpected circumstances.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.939
Threshold uncertainty score0.990

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it